Archive

Archive for the ‘Web Hosting’ Category

A Brief Look at KVM Switches

December 15th, 2011 2 comments

A KVM switch (keyboard, video, mouse switch) essentially allows  - a user(s) to access multiple CPUs from a single monitor, keyboard and mouse. KVM switches are found in virtually every data center, because let’s face it; having hundreds or thousands of monitors, keyboards or mice in a DC is unrealistic.

Integrated KVM switching systems provide administrators – KVM, console, and remote power control of thousands of servers, which results in space savings, improved server management, reduced heat issues – and the bottom line, cost savings.

Data Centers typically use enterprise wide solutions – geared to Network Operating Centers (NOC), which allows their engineers to remotely access servers.

If you rent colocation space for your businesses rack servers – most KVM will usually take up 1U of space, up to a 42 port solution.  When ordering, be sure to remember rack mount kits and interface cables.

All KVMs are NOT created equal – variances can be in audio support, client platforms, supported operating systems, interfaces, sharing, remote power management and 208 volt power capability.

What about security? Enterprise level KVMs offer administrators complete control of all the devices that are attached, allowing them to set permissions for all other users.  They can create individual user profiles and assign access privileges. One example of an access privilege would be the ability to define which servers a user could view and access. Some allow time-out features for inactive users.

Categories: Miscellaneous Tags:

Are Web Hosting Review Sites Reputable?

November 28th, 2011 No comments

It seems like I see a new web hosting review site daily - and most share a common theme – their top ten web hosting providers all look like affiliate links. By affiliate links, I mean the web hosting review site owners either make a commission every time a shopper clicks thru from one of their top ten sites, or purchases hosting from them.

Sadly, the majority of review sites actually have - NO verifiable reviews. Most of the reviews I read are either from shills or disgruntled clients, or are so old, they don’t pertain to a provider’s current operations.

From Wikipedia:

A shill or plant is a person who helps another person or organization to sell goods or services without disclosing that he or she has a close relationship with the seller. The shill pretends to have no association with the seller/group and gives onlookers the impression that he or she is an enthusiastic independent customer. The person or group that hires the shill is using crowd psychology, to encourage other onlookers or audience members (who are unaware of the set-up) to purchase the said goods or services.

For shoppers searching for the best web hosting provider - web hosting review sites may NOT be the best resource. A better option would be to visit any number of web hosting forums, like WebHostingTalk or HostingDiscussion. Reviews there are verified by moderators of their respective forums. One of the prerequisites is that you have to be hosted with a provider to post a review about them – verified by your URL. As well, members of these forums weigh in on the validity or merits of each review.

Google is still one of your best friends when it comes to doing research - on web hosting providers, combined with pre-sales chats with prospective hosts.

Categories: Web Hosting Tags:

How Important Is Password Security?

November 21st, 2011 No comments

Didn’t your Mom tell you not to play with fire? Weak passwords put your personal identity or business data at risk of being compromised. How important is password security? A simple Google search for password security just now returned over 540 million results – that’s significant! I cannot overemphasize how important it is to use STRONG passwords.

Some guidelines

  • Use at least eight characters, with mixed case letters (upper and lower case)
  • Use a password that can be typed quickly (to prevent over the shoulder spying)
  • Mix alpha numeric characters in a seemingly random manner.
  • Change your password regularly.
  • Do NOT use words that are included in any dictionary – even encrypted, these can be cracked in seconds!!
  • Do NOT use dates
  • Do NOT use information that can be easily obtained about you. This includes your nickname, your pet’s name, your hometown, etc.
  • Do NOT use all numbers or all alphabet characters – mix them!
  • Do NOT reveal your password to anyone!

There are any number of websites that help you understand - how vulnerable your passwords are – one of those is http://howsecureismypassword.net/ Simply enter your password and it will return how long it would take to crack it. Mine was six thousand years, but I could improve that by using a symbol instead of just letters and numbers.

Microsoft also has a password security strength checker - located at https://www.microsoft.com/security/pc-security/password-checker.aspx. Starting at a rating of STRONG, I had to add 10 symbols to raise that level of security to BEST. Going back to HowSecureIsMyPassword, when I typed in Microsoft’s BEST, here is the result I got - It would take a desktop PC about 523 sextillion years to crack your password. Works for me!

Categories: Security Tags:

VPS Burst Versus Swap Memory

November 15th, 2011 6 comments

Burst versus swap discussions are normally – comparisons of OpenVZ versus Xen memory management. There are advantages and disadvantages to each, with burst associated with VZ and swap to Xen. Assuming everything else is equal, which would you consider is the better option – 1024MB guaranteed (SLM) or 768MB guaranteed (burstable to 2048MB)?

I just read of an experiment – pairing the two technologies under load conditions. The test involved an OpenVZ container (512MB dedicated RAM with 512MB burst) versus a XEN based VPS (768MB with swap). A basic Debian 5 64 bit OS was installed on each with LAMP, email and Jabber/XMPP. The total OpenVZ memory usage equaled 445MB versus XEN’s 296MB.

So what can we take away from this test? If you’re running Java or other applications that tend to allocate large amounts of virtual memory, OpenVZ containers (without burst) will have less guaranteed memory available. Enter burst .. OpenVZ needs an appropriate amount of burst (usually 1.5 to 2 times the guaranteed).

Beyond guaranteed to burst and swap – access latency on RAM (burst) is measured in nanoseconds whereas swap (HDD) is measured in milliseconds (much much slower). Swap is slow, so you want ample guaranteed (SLM) to handle your applications. Plus, your system cannot execute stuff out of swap. It has to be in active RAM to execute. With both burst and swap, you want just enough allocation to handle inactive data, keeping as much active data in guaranteed RAM as possible.

Overselling can be – an issue with OpenVZ, e.g., killing your application if it bursts beyond the guaranteed resource allocation, instead of simply slowing down as with a true dedicated server. The kernel of Virtuozzo cannot be modified as it’s based on an OS template. By contrast (using default settings), Xen doesn’t allow overselling, so a physical server with 16GB of RAM would be limited to 64 x 256MB virtual machines. Plus, XEN allows you to fully modify the kernel, so advanced users can compile and load their own modules, resulting in properly virtualized memory, IO and scheduler – that’s stable and predictable.

Categories: Virtual Private Servers (VPS) Tags:

Bandwidth Conversion Chart

October 31st, 2011 No comments

Bandwidth is defined as:

Measure of data flow rate in digital networks

From Wikipedia:

In website hosting, the term “bandwidth” is often incorrectly used to describe the amount of data transferred to or from the website or server within a prescribed period of time, for example, bandwidth consumption accumulated over a month measured in gigabytes per month. The more accurate phrase used for this meaning of a maximum amount of data transfer each month or given period is monthly data transfer.

On hosting packages - one of  the features always listed is monthly bandwidth allowed. There seems to be some confusion converting Mbps to GB or TB per month, so I’ve assembled a quick reference, based on a 30 day month.

Mbps

GB

TB

Mbps

GB

TB

Mbps

GB

TB

1

330

0.33

35

11550

11.55

68

22440

22.44

2

660

0.66

36

11880

11.88

69

22770

22.77

3

990

0.99

37

12210

12.21

70

23100

23.10

4

1320

1.32

38

12540

12.54

71

23430

23.43

5

1650

1.65

39

12870

12.87

72

23760

23.76

6

1980

1.98

40

13200

13.20

73

24090

24.09

7

2310

2.31

41

13530

13.53

74

24420

24.42

8

2640

2.64

42

13860

13.86

75

24750

24.75

9

2970

2.97

43

14190

14.19

76

25080

25.08

10

3300

3.30

44

14520

14.52

77

25410

25.41

11

3630

3.63

45

14850

14.85

78

25740

25.74

12

3960

3.96

46

15180

15.18

79

26070

26.07

13

4290

4.29

47

15510

15.51

80

26400

26.40

14

4620

4.62

48

15840

15.84

81

26730

26.73

15

4950

4.95

49

16170

16.17

82

27060

27.06

16

5280

5.28

50

16500

16.50

83

27390

27.39

17

5610

5.61

51

16830

16.83

84

27720

27.72

18

5940

5.94

52

17160

17.16

85

28050

28.05

19

6270

6.27

53

17490

17.49

86

28380

28.38

20

6600

6.60

54

17820

17.82

87

28710

28.71

21

6930

6.93

55

18150

18.15

88

29040

29.04

22

7260

7.26

56

18480

18.48

89

29370

29.37

23

7590

7.59

57

18810

18.81

90

29700

29.70

24

7920

7.92

58

19140

19.14

91

30030

30.03

25

8250

8.25

59

19470

19.47

92

30360

30.36

26

8580

8.58

60

19800

19.80

93

30690

30.69

27

8910

8.91

61

20130

20.13

94

31020

31.02

28

9240

9.24

62

20460

20.46

95

31350

31.35

29

9570

9.57

63

20790

20.79

96

31680

31.68

30

9900

9.90

64

21120

21.12

97

32010

32.01

31

10230

10.23

65

21450

21.45

98

32340

32.34

32

10560

10.56

66

21780

21.78

99

32670

32.67

33

10890

10.89

67

22110

22.11

100

33000

33.00

34

11220

11.22

           

Categories: Bandwidth Tags:

Please Read the Fine Print on Bandwidth Offers to Accurately Compare Providers

October 26th, 2011 2 comments

There’s a lot of controversy in web hosting circles – on how to compete with bandwidth offers, with some providers offering unlimited bandwidth on their plans, although most restrict this to shared hosting only.

Unlike most, I suppose, when I see the term UNLIMITED - I always look for the fine print, very much the same way I view the term FREE. I’m like, I know there’s a catch, but now where to find out what it is.

And I’m not saying all Unlimited offers are bad – just that it normally pays huge dividends long term to know what to expect when your website gets popular, and starts pushing a ton of traffic. Some providers handle Unlimited very well, while others will boot you in heart beat for violating their Terms and Conditions (buried somewhere in there is a clause that explains how their Unlimited offer really isn’t Unlimited).

I ran across an advertisement this morning – for Unlimited bandwidth on a dedicated server, which is very rare. I won’t say who the provider is, but here is a quote from their website:

Naturally with unlimited traffic for more cost transparency

(note that there is no asterisk on traffic)

Under benefits, they show

Traffic                   Unlimited*

(now comes an asterisk – uh oh, have to read the fine print)

At the bottom of the page, in small print

*There are no charges for overage. We will permanently restrict the connection speed to 10 MBit/s if more than 10,000 GB/month are used (the basis for calculation is for outgoing traffic only. Incoming and internal traffic is not calculated). 100 MBit/s speed can be optionally restored by committing to pay 6,90 € (incl. VAT) per additional TB used. Please see here for information on how to proceed.

So what can we glean from this clause? First, that their servers are on a 100Mbps uplink port, which is an industry standard, but it also LIMITS your data transfer to that speed. And then there’s that opening sentence about no charges for overage – but wait, what overages? I thought this was unlimited.

On to 10,000GB/month or 10TB/month – that’s a lot of data transfer, but it isn’t “unlimited.” OK, so your site has pushed in excess of 10TB so far this month, and you got hit with a notice that your port speed is now “permanently” restricted to 10Mbps, or one tenth of what they could allow.

Option 1: If you expect a continuing excess of traffic limit, we offer for 6.90 € each additional GB of bandwidth to the permanent establishment to 100 Mbit / sec.

Notice the hyperlink here in their clause on how to proceed. Seems that permanent really isn’t permanent if you start paying, but wait – the clause says 6.90 per additional TB used, but when clicking through, Option 1 states 6.90 for each additional GB of bandwidth – that’s a HUGE difference. I can’t help but think one of those is a typo.

Again, I’m not saying Unlimited is necessarily bad – just that you need to calculate the risks associated with these offers by reading the fine print first. Whether or not a provider offers limits on bandwidth or offers unlimited is not a reflection of the quality of their respective services.

Categories: Web Hosting Plans Tags:

Private versus Public Cloud Services

October 21st, 2011 3 comments

Revised Oct 21, 2011

Private versus Public Cloud Solutions
Let’s face it, there are BILLIONS of dollars invested in existing IT infrastructure. As more and more enterprise vendors step into the cloud arena, will business in general migrate to the public cloud or opt instead to keep much of their investment in legacy code and custom applications in-house via a private cloud?

The future of cloud computing is up in the air (pun intended)
At this point, we don’t really know how cloud technology is going to shake out. Even if cloud technology gets huge, there’s likely to be a split between private and public clouds for the foreseeable decade. I think as the industry matures, you’ll see commodity services migrate to the public cloud and mission-critical stuff linger in a private cloud.

OK, so what is cloud computing?
Essentially, cloud computing is simply another way of delivering computing resources to run websites and web applications. It allows clients to scale their operations, horizontally and vertically, based on the demands of their users, while ensuring that there are adequate resources to support their apps. You can think of it as technology services delivered on-demand.

Traditional web hosting services are offered in packages with set limits on disk space and data transfer, so as traffic fluctuates, data and transfer needs vary resulting in excess, unused capacity during lean times.

Who could benefit from Cloud Services?
Essentially, everyone could benefit from cloud technology. Businesses that experience seasonal spikes, especially eCommerce retailers, where 80+ percent of their business peaks during holiday seasons, are prime candidates for cloud services.Cloud computing offers those businesses enough services to meet their increased traffic demands, then the option to scale back after the holidays, aligning their operating costs with revenue.

Taking the lead from the BIG vendors
Nearly all of the BIG vendors, from Microsoft to HP and IBM to CISCO, are talking cloud, with most listing their top two priorities as virtualization and cloud computing (virtualization is a cloud enabler). Google and Amazon already host public clouds while vendors like EMC are promoting solutions that virtualize existing servers and storage (private cloud).

Types of private versus public cloud solutions
As the following graphic from Microsoft highlights, there are choices to both private and public cloud services. Of course, these are not all inclusive. In the following months, I’ll address different cloud scenarios, demystifying some of the confusion about what cloud services really offer

Categories: Cloud Services, Featured Articles Tags:
Privacy Policy | TOS